Welcome to GridBrief, your source for in-depth analysis of the critical issues shaping the energy industry. California’s electricity rates are climbing higher than inflation, emissions progress is stalling as power demand surges, and Constellation may be eyeing a $30 billion bet on natural gas. As always, we’ll cut through the noise, spotlight what matters, and put it all into perspective—alongside our signature Good Bet and Bad Bet to keep things sharp. Let’s dive in.

California’s Skyrocketing Electricity Rates

California’s Legislative Analyst's Office has revealed that residential electricity rates are rising faster than inflation, second only to Hawaii nationwide. The report points to wildfire-related costs, ambitious greenhouse gas policies, and structural inefficiencies as driving factors. Utilities like PG&E and SMUD have implemented or announced fixed charges aimed at stabilizing revenue, but critics argue these strategies disproportionately burden non-solar customers and discourage electrification—key to California’s climate goals.

PG&E, notorious for rate hikes in 2024, insists customer bills are stabilizing, yet frustration among ratepayers remains palpable. As the Golden State pivots toward an electrified future, the question looms: Can its grid—and its citizens—afford the transition without substantial reforms?

U.S. Power Demand Surges, Emissions Stagnate

America's greenhouse gas emissions barely dipped in 2024, as surging power demand offset gains from renewables. The Rhodium Group attributes a 3% spike in electricity usage to a scorching summer and growing energy-intensive data centers, leading to record natural gas consumption despite expanding wind and solar capacity.

This plateau underscores a stark reality: the U.S. is falling further behind on its 2030 emissions targets. With electrification ramping up across sectors, utilities delaying coal plant retirements, and natural gas continuing its dominance, the nation faces mounting challenges in balancing reliability, affordability, and decarbonization.

Constellation Eyes Calpine in $30 Billion Power Play

Constellation Energy, already the U.S. leader in nuclear power, is reportedly in talks to acquire Calpine, a Houston-based energy giant, for $30 billion. The move would bolster Constellation’s natural gas portfolio at a time when tech-driven electricity demand is skyrocketing. However, investors are skeptical—Constellation’s stock fell 6% on the news.

Calpine’s 27 GW of generation capacity, largely natural gas, could position Constellation as the go-to provider for power-hungry AI and data centers. Yet the hefty price tag raises concerns about profitability in a sector where regulatory and market pressures remain unpredictable.

Upgrade to Grid Brief Premium to get extra deep dives into energy issues all over the world.

Conversation Starters

• Thailand’s Bitcoin Mining Bust - CryptoNews: Authorities shut down a clandestine Bitcoin mining operation stealing millions in electricity. This adds to global concerns about crypto’s energy footprint and enforcement challenges.

• Microreactor Boom - Financial Times: Westinghouse and other firms are scaling down nuclear reactors to the size of shipping containers, aiming to power data centers, mines, and remote areas. But questions about regulation, safety, and economics linger.

• HALEU Fuel Risks - Reuters: The U.S. is exploring the proliferation risks of high-assay, low-enriched uranium (HALEU), critical for next-gen nuclear reactors. As domestic HALEU production ramps up, stakeholders debate whether tighter controls are needed to prevent misuse.

Good Bet, Bad Bet

Good Bet: Constellation Energy
With data centers driving unprecedented power demand, Constellation’s nuclear dominance and potential acquisition of Calpine make it a strong long-term play. Expect this bet to pay off as AI expands and clean baseload power becomes indispensable.

Bad Bet: President Carter and Oil Shale
Amid the energy crises of the 1970s, President Carter declared that oil shale—a resource-rich rock that could be processed to produce crude oil—would be the silver bullet for U.S. energy independence. Billions of dollars and countless projects later, the process proved uneconomical, environmentally damaging, and largely abandoned. Today, oil shale is a cautionary tale about overhyping unproven technologies.

Share Grid Brief

We rely on word of mouth to grow. If you're enjoying this, don't forget to forward Grid Brief to your friends and ask them to subscribe!